Okay, all done with number nine. I decided to send it to the Times first.
I think that I might have a turnaround problem, hence the choice (they must close their issues MUCH more quickly than the New Yorker). All of the events I’m describing are, well, current, and it’s taking me a week to write the essays. The turnaround time probably has to be more like a day.
Ironically, as a stay-at-home mom with a babysitter two days a week, my mother taking care of almost everything, and Kylie in pre-school two and a half hours every day, I’m finding it hard to make the time.
I know I should add “cancer patient” to that list. Entire days are consumed with waiting rooms and trips into the city and needles and tests that involve nuclear radiation and huge machines. Other times I either need to rest, or want to be with Kylie, even if I’m not really the one taking care of her.
Oh, it always comes back to the cancer, doesn’t it? Wah wah wah, my life’s so hard, I have trouble making up 600 words per week.
Maybe I should go festoon myself with pink ribbons. Does that make anybody feel better? I mean, I wore a flag pin after September 11th, and that actually did make me feel better. I guess I just don't want to think about cancer when I don't have to; hence my not purchasing the pink KitchenAid "Cook for the Cure" line of appliances, which I otherwise find attractive.
I sent a rather harsh e-mail message to my nurse at Sloan-Kettering yesterday, regarding the research fellow's lack of follow-through when I told him, weeks ago, about the Green Vibrance, and how I found out later that it was providing my tumor, which likes to eat estrogen, with plenty of estrogen, etc. He left a message today, while I was out taking Kylie to school, asking me to call back, and saying that he’d try to reach me again later.
I didn’t call him back. Take that, medical establishment. I don’t want to talk to this doctor, who is actually a senior fellow, not a real grown-up oncologist, and whom I have considered more and less of a jackass. He has not called back. Maybe I’ll threaten to quit their precious study and see if that really gets their attention.
Maybe it's not fair to call him a jackass in a semi-public forum. But he was the one who told me that the median time to tumor recurrence, after chemo, was 13 months, "so there's hope." When I choked out "13 months?" he explained to me that that was the median, which meant that half the people involved didn't see their tumors recur for more than 13 months.
I was too much in shock to thank him for explaining what the word "median" meant (jackass) or to point out that the median also meant that half the patients saw theirs tumors recur before 13 months.
Having just relived this little exchange, I have concluded that even should this doctor see this post and recognize himself, I am comfortable referring to him as a jackass.